Back to Technology
Working Routers Bricked and Binned: Australia's Broadband Study Ends in an E-Waste Controversy
Technology

Working Routers Bricked and Binned: Australia's Broadband Study Ends in an E-Waste Controversy

3h ago0 views

Key takeaways

  • Thousands of SamKnows routers used in Australia's MBA broadband testing program were remotely disabled after the initiative concluded on June 30, 2026, despite remaining fully functional.
  • The devices run a customized OpenWRT firmware and could theoretically be reflashed for personal use, but neither the ACCC nor Cisco offered volunteers an official path to repurpose them.
  • Both Cisco and the ACCC deflected journalists' questions about why a firmware unlock was not provided, raising concerns about corporate accountability and unnecessary e-waste generation.

A broadband measurement initiative run by Australia's competition watchdog has concluded in a way that has left volunteers frustrated and environmentalists concerned — with thousands of perfectly working routers rendered useless at the stroke of a deadline. The Measuring Broadband Australia (MBA) program, administered by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), distributed SamKnows-branded whitebox routers to volunteers starting in 2020. Their job was to passively test and report on real-world broadband speeds across Australia's National Broadband Network and other fixed-line infrastructure. The program wrapped up last month, and by June 30, 2026, every participating device had been remotely bricked.

Volunteers received an email in mid-June from 'The SamKnows Team (part of Cisco)' informing them that their whiteboxes would be disabled, their accounts closed, and their measurement data deleted in accordance with licensing terms. The email directed users to dispose of the hardware through free e-waste services at retailers like JB Hi-Fi, Harvey Norman, and Officeworks. While the language around responsible disposal was present, no pathway to repurpose or unlock the devices was offered — despite the hardware being fully operational at the time of shutdown.

The ACCC initially expected to distribute around 4,000 routers over the life of the program, with more than 2,600 deployed by December 2020 alone. The exact number disabled last month was not disclosed by the ACCC when asked by journalists. What is known is that the devices run a customized version of OpenWRT, an open-source Linux-based firmware platform widely used in the networking community. That detail is crucial: it means the routers could, in theory, be reflashed and returned to general use without any specialized proprietary software — a point one anonymous volunteer made forcefully.

At least one volunteer has already successfully reflashed their device into a functioning Wi-Fi router running standard OpenWRT, though doing so without official support apparently requires a soldering iron. That volunteer told reporters the process worked well and expressed frustration that SamKnows or Cisco hadn't simply issued a final firmware update to open the devices up to end users. 'It seems a shame to me that these perfectly good devices should all be disabled simply because the company can't be bothered to send out a final firmware update that opens the devices up to end users,' they said.

When journalists pressed both Cisco and the ACCC for an explanation, neither provided a satisfying answer. Cisco deferred all questions to the ACCC, while the ACCC's statement confirmed the shutdown without addressing questions about e-waste or alternative options. The situation echoes a similar SamKnows program in the United States, where 9,000 routers were distributed for FCC broadband testing in 2011 — and whose fate after that program ended has also never been publicly clarified. The lack of transparency across multiple programs and jurisdictions suggests this is a broader, unresolved policy issue within the broadband measurement industry.

The bigger picture

The MBA router situation shines a harsh light on an issue that rarely gets discussed when government tech programs are designed: end-of-life planning for distributed hardware. It is one thing to brick a proprietary device with deeply embedded software that poses genuine security risks if left in the wild. It is quite another to disable a router running open-source firmware that the hacking and networking community already knows how to manage. The decision to simply disable these devices — with no firmware unlock, no donation scheme, and no community handoff — smacks of institutional convenience dressed up as policy.

The corporate dynamics here are also worth examining. SamKnows was acquired by Cisco in 2023, years after the MBA program began under a different ownership structure. Cisco's own ThousandEyes division now absorbs SamKnows' brand and operations. When multiple parties share responsibility for a program's outcomes, accountability tends to dissolve — which may explain why both Cisco and the ACCC responded to pointed questions with deflection rather than answers. There is likely a risk-management rationale buried in there somewhere: if devices are unlocked and something goes wrong — a security vulnerability, a misuse scenario — nobody wants their name attached to it.

What this signals for future government tech programs is worth watching closely. As smart devices, broadband equipment, and IoT hardware become more embedded in public infrastructure initiatives, the question of what happens when those programs end will only grow more pressing. Regulators and vendors alike need to build e-waste and hardware reuse frameworks into program contracts from day one, not treat disposal as an afterthought. The tinkerers who have already found ways to keep these routers alive are doing the work that policymakers should have done before the plug was ever pulled.

LagPing's take

We decided to cover this story because it sits at the uncomfortable intersection of government accountability, corporate opacity, and a very tangible environmental cost — and those are exactly the kinds of stories we think deserve more attention in tech media. It is easy to dismiss a few thousand decommissioned routers as a minor footnote, but the pattern this represents is significant. Programs that distribute hardware to thousands of people should not be allowed to quietly generate e-waste without scrutiny, especially when technically sound alternatives exist. We also think the DIY angle here is genuinely interesting — the fact that at least one volunteer has already successfully reflashed their device shows what is possible when communities are empowered rather than locked out. As conversations about right-to-repair and sustainable tech grow louder globally, this Australian case is a timely and concrete example of the stakes involved. We will be watching to see whether the ACCC or SamKnows eventually responds with more transparency.

Find "Router" on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, LagPing earns from qualifying purchases. Product links are affiliate links.

You might also like